Bonus Hunting VS Rakeback
Posted by jonshon on July 31, 2008
It’s a big question that how one can hunt the best sign-up bonus while playing poker on online poker rooms. In order to solve such problem one has to first select the best suitable game to be played for clearing bonus.
One can play any game of any limit to clear a bonus excepting the games of micro-limits. However, 6-max Limit Holdem game of $1 to $2 is the ideal game to clear bonuses. One can clear a sign-up bonus by playing no limit holdem; however one cannot play multi-table no limit holdem efficiently as compared to limit holdem games.
It is obvious that the more a player plays on multi-tables, the faster he/she can clear bonuses that lead to increase his/her rate of earning per hour. One can play more poker tables with the limit of full ring rather than short-handed, however, he/she can get up to double amounts of poker hands on a short-handed poker table rather than the hands get in the full ring games. Playing more hands every hour reflects the faster clearing of bonus. With some of the bonuses, one should play with $1 to $2, which is really the best gaming limit. They can be cleared at 50 cents to $1fastly as one can clear with $1 to $2; however, usually $1 to $2 is the perfect limit for clearing a bonus.
If a player really wants to become successful bonus hunter, he/she should work to get the skills of playing short-handed limit games of $1 to $2 as well as to grow the skills to multi-table gambling up to playing at least more than five tables at the same time and this must be his/her end-goal. For example, a player was playing 10x, 6-max limit game of $1 to $2 at an online poker room at once for clearing reloaded bonuses. This might be sounding crazy, especially, if a player is habitual to play a single tabled poker game at one time, however, if he/she keeps him/herself to push, he/she will be amazed that how he/she have build up his/her skills to play multi-table games. One should not push him/herself very far and very fast, instead make him/herself sure regarding his comfortability of to play poker at multi-tables. When one thinks that he/she can handle one more table, he/she should open one up and observe how he/she goes. Before he/she knows it, he/she will have opened five poker tables and he/she will be thinking to play on these tables. This will be a little boring thing but is required to become a successful bonus hunter.
Possible rate of earnings:
One can hunt a bonus and earn a profit even if he/she is not a winning player, a rough math can be run when by a poker site for showing the possibilities of earning money to the player, if he/she is a winning player at the limit of $1 to $2 and learning to clear bonuses effectively on 6-max multi-tables. If a 2bb/100 player plays at $1 to $2, he/she will get to earn $4 for all 100 hands played. The average e-max games include around 100 hands every hour. It certainly happens in some poker sites. Now, if a player plays on 5 tables, he/she is earning already $20 per hour, excluding the bonus. On a certain poker website, the initial bonus to sign-up is 100 dollars, through 7x, or 700 raked hands for clearing. However, not all his/her 500 hand/hour would be raked; he/she would probably take just 3 hours for clearing 700 poker hands. His/her hourly rate of earning has just increased from 20 dollars per our to around 50 dollars per hour. Of course, these are really rough calculations, but from them one can start observing potentials. It is the figure of $50 per hour that one should work towards if he/she is moving to hunt bonus seriously. He/she would not earn that straight away if he/she cannot clear a 6-max limit game at 5 poker tables of $1 to $2, but he/she will get him/her there prior too long.
Of course, all the bonuses are not very good as compare to the initial sign-up bonus of the poker site given in the above example. Also not all the sites let the players to play more than five poker tables at a particular time, or having much specialized software. So, the true hourly earning of a player will possibly hover around 25 to 40 dollars every hour once he/she lead to build up his/her skills, but that is not much unsatisfactory. He/she will make more than a brick and mortar professional would play with an average rate of 15/30 in a casino, but he/she will play 1 to 2 dollars.
Bonus hunting vs. Rakeback:
For instance, if a player paid 180 dollars in the rake only under the 3000 hands in a sample of 1 to 2 dollars in Poker Tracker. The standard poker deal of rakeback will give him/her around twenty-five percent, so that would only be 45 dollars in a rakeback. If he/she was clearing 7x bonuses, he would have received from 300 to 400 dollars in bonus by playing 3000 poker hands, so he/she can easily observe how good the bonuses are as compared to rakeback.
Disclaimer:
Certainly, this can be regarded as an extremely rough example. The Total Rake is of small sample size calculated by Poker Tracker is a rake paid by the player. Whereas, the working f the rakeback depends upon the table rake alienated among the players etc. This is only for showing the potential strength of bonuses to the low limit players in contrast to rakeback. No point is there to get worried about rakeback if the player would not get 5/10 or 10/20.
The player ran at 4.5bb/100, for such 3000 poker hands as a side note that is up swinging for him/her, even at 6-max with 1 to 2 dollars. However, he/she cleared 10x bonuses; he/she still would have geared up more from the bonuses as compared to the actual winnings from poker game.
more at online casino reviews
